I research AI for History and Economic History. My work focuses on using AI to build large-scale historical datasets from primary-source PDFs to study how institutions shaped patenting behaviour in Germany's Second Industrial Revolution.

Beyond this, I contribute to a new paradigm of historical research: counterfactual history through AI. We train language models exclusively on historical data up to a specific cutoff date, such as 1911. This also offers an AI for Science angle for the Hassabis AGI Einstein Test: can AI discover relativity with the information available to Einstein at the time?

In the long term, I aim to advance AI Co-Historians that help historians analyse the vast archival collections still largely unread by humans, contributing to a golden age of historical discovery. As this may become reality, I am also interested in how AI alignment will shape how models read and interpret historical documents.

My work is supported by a EUR 65,000 NFDI4Memory Incubator Grant, on which I serve as Co-PI. I am a founding member of Philip Torr's AI for History Team, which is supported by Schmidt Sciences.

Papers

Pretraining Language Models on Historical Text

Xiaoxi Luo, Zachary Shinnick, Niclas Griesshaber, Yixuan Wang, Junchi Yu, Freda Shi, Philip Torr, and Yao Lu

Accepted, EMNLP 2026 (Main Conference)

Abstract·Try the History LLM

We introduce TypewriterLM, a 7.24B History language model (LM) trained exclusively on English text predating 1913. Developing History LMs requires addressing challenges in data quality and availability, preventing temporal leakage, designing temporally consistent post-training pipelines, and constructing reliable evaluations. To address these issues, we construct TypewriterCorpus, a 54B-token historical corpus collected from diverse archival and linguistically annotated sources with extensive data cleaning and leakage mitigation procedures. Furthermore, we introduce lexically grounded instructing tuning, a post-training framework that constraints responses to remain directly grounded in historical source documents. Using this framework we construct two historical instruction tuning datasets: History-LIMA and History-SelfInstruct. To evaluate capability and temporal consistency, we introduce History-Event, a benchmark suite for evaluating competence, temporal grounding and data leakage. We release TypewriterLM and all associated resources to support future research on historical language models.

Chronos: The AI Co-Historian

Lorenz Hufe, Niclas Griesshaber*, Gavin Greif*, Sebastian Oliver Eck, and Philip Torr

Abstract·Download Chronos

AI is increasingly supporting, accelerating, and automating scientific discovery across subjects. Yet, the adoption of AI in historical research remains limited due to the lack of specialised solutions for historians. To change this, we introduce Chronos, an AI Co-Historian designed to support historians. It allows researchers to create and customize research workflows through natural-language interaction and share these as Chronos-Extensions with others. Chronos specifically addresses the need of historians for a tool that is specialised, non-technical, highly customizable, and facilitates extensive task evaluation. As a first extension, we introduce Chronos-Extract, which enables researchers to automate the targeted extraction of information from image scans of historical sources. We benchmark Chronos-Extract on three historical source corpora and find that it achieves high task-accuracy across primary sources spanning three centuries and diverse languages, layouts, and typefaces. Chronos is openly available and ready for historians to use on their own primary and secondary sources.

Multimodal LLMs for Historical Dataset Construction from Archival Image Scans: German Patents (1877-1918)

Niclas Griesshaber and Jochen Streb

Forthcoming in Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte

Abstract

We leverage multimodal large language models (LLMs) to construct a dataset of 306,070 German patents (1877–1918) from 9,562 archival image scans. Our benchmarking exercise provides tentative evidence that multimodal LLMs can create higher quality datasets than our research assistants, while also being more than 795 times faster and 205 times cheaper in constructing the structured dataset from our image corpus. About 20 to 50 patent entries are embedded on each page, arranged in a double-column format and printed in Gothic and Roman fonts. The font and layout complexity of our primary source material suggests to us that multimodal LLMs are a paradigm shift in how datasets are constructed in economic history.

Multimodal LLMs for OCR, OCR Post-Correction, and NER in Historical Documents

Gavin Greif, Niclas Griesshaber*, and Robin Greif

Forthcoming in Economic History Yearbook

Abstract

We explore how multimodal Large Language Models (mLLMs) can help researchers transcribe historical documents, extract relevant historical information, and construct datasets from historical sources. Specifically, we investigate the capabilities of mLLMs in performing (1) Optical Character Recognition (OCR), (2) OCR Post-Correction, and (3) Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks on a set of city directories published in German between 1754 and 1870. First, we benchmark the off-the-shelf transcription accuracy of both mLLMs and conventional OCR models. We find that the best performing mLLM model significantly outperforms conventional state-of-the-art OCR models and other frontier mLLMs, achieving CERs well below 1 percent. Second, we test multimodal post-correction of OCR output using mLLMs. We find that this approach leads to significant improvements in transcription accuracy, yet it no longer consistently or substantially outperforms mLLM-only transcriptions. Third, we demonstrate that mLLMs can efficiently recognize entities in historical documents and parse them into structured dataset formats. We conclude that mLLMs can serve as integrated end-to-end solutions for historical information extraction without document pre- or post-processing. Our findings provide evidence for the long-term potential of mLLMs to introduce a paradigm shift in the approaches to historical data collection and document transcription.

Transplanting Craft Guilds to Colonial Latin America: A Large Language Model Analysis

Niclas Griesshaber and Sheilagh Ogilvie

CEPR Discussion Paper

Abstract

What can we learn about institutional transplantation by analyzing craft guilds in colonial Latin America? We use large language models (LLMs) to investigate colonial guild ordinances, addressing two major bottlenecks in assessing institutions: digitizing qualitative sources efficiently and analyzing them quantitatively. Our newly designed methodology reveals both long-term continuities and striking differences between craft guilds in colonial Mexico and Peru, particularly with regard to human capital and product quality. The LLM-based approach identifies patterns that were previously not discernible using standard methods in economic history, its results are reproducible, and it can easily be extended to other historical settings.